Defamation
Defamation is a statement calculated to escape a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to injure him in his trade, business, profession, calling or office. It is of two types i.e. libel and slander.
Defamation is a statement calculated to escape a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to injure him in his trade, business, profession, calling or office. It is of two types i.e. libel and slander.
Libel is a form
of defamation in permanent form such as written documents. It in itself is
infringement of plaintiff’s rights and no actual damage is required.
Yousoupoff v.
M.G.M. Pictures Ltd.[(1934) 50 TLR 581] – The movie figuratively showed
plaintiff’s wife being seduced by someone else. It was decided that in a cinema
film, not only the photographic part is considered to be a libel but also the
speech which synchronises with it is also a libel.
Innuendo – Explanatory averment in the
statement of claim defining the meaning which plaintiff assigns to the
complained of or specifying the plaintiff as the person to whom they apply.
Cassidy v. Daily
Mirror ([1929] 2 KB 331) – The defendant published a photo in which plaintiff’s
husband was posing with a girl and published that the husband will marry this
girl. This implied that plaintiff was a kept off and hence suit was found to be
maintainable and plaintiff was awarded damages.
Slander is the
defamation is an oral or transient form addressed to the ear. Slander may be
uttered in the heat of the moment and under sudden provocation. In India,
Slander is both a tort and crime but in England slander is civil wrong only.
Slander is the defamation in a transient form, whether audible, as in spoken
words, or visible, as in the case of gesture. Slander is actionable only if
plaintiff is able to show special damages. (Frank Flaman Wholesale Ltd. v.
Firman [1982] S.J. No. 279)
The following
are defence to defamation.
Truth – In a
defamation case, the defendant can only be held liable if the statement
involved was false. A true statement does not meet the legal requirements for
defamation.
Absolute
Privileges – Some defendants are protected from liability in a defamation
action based on the defendant’s position or status. Absolute privileges apply
to the following proceedings and circumstances:
·
judicial proceedings
·
legislative proceedings
·
some executive statements and publications
·
publications between spouses
·
publications required by law
Conditional/Qualified
Privileges – These privileges do not arise as a result of the person making the
communication, but rather arise from the particular occasion during which the
statement was made. These privileges are known as conditional, or qualified,
privileges. Conditional privileges apply to the following types of
communications:
·
A statement that is made for the protection of
the publisher’s interest
·
A statement that is made for the protection of
the interests of a third person
·
A statement that is made for the protection of
common interest
·
A statement that is made to ensure the
well-being of a family member
·
A statement that is made where the person making
the communication believes that the public interest requires communication of
the statement to a public officer or other official
·
A statement that is made by an inferior state
officer who is not entitled to an absolute privilege
Reynolds v Times
Newspapers Ltd ([2001] 2 AC 127) – The Plaintiff, an Irish politician sued
defendants for an article published in their newspaper. The Plaintiff claimed
that the words in the article bore the meaning that he had deliberately lied to
mislead his cabinet colleagues. The Defendants pleaded the defence of qualified
privilege. The court refused to accept the defendant’s plea and observed that a
new subject matter category of qualified privilege whereby the publication of
all political information would attract qualified privilege whatever the
circumstances, would fail to provide adequate protection for reputation.